Author Topic: Best 27" 1440p AHVA/IPS/PLS Monitors  (Read 10649 times)

NCX

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 628
    • View Profile
Best 27" 1440p AHVA/IPS/PLS Monitors
« on: August 12, 2018, 07:32:30 pm »
Last Update=May 21st 2019

All New Reviews Added Here

Please support my work via crypto currencies or Paypal (paypal email is thedeepinthesky@yahoo.com).  NCX's Amazon wish list

BTC address:
Spoiler (hover to show)

ETH address:
Spoiler (hover to show)

LTC address:
Spoiler (hover to show)

Best Reviewed Flicker Free 27" 1440p AHVA/IPS/PLS

Always purchase from retailers with hassle free return and exchange policies.  Read retailers return and exchange policies before buying.

My recommendations are based off of testing more than 60 monitors and reading in-depth reviews from over fifteen reviewers across the realm.

Best Monitor Review Sites: Monitor Review Resource Center

Many monitors not found in this thread likely perform well, but it makes more sense to buy well reviewed monitors, and I like having sources to refer to, even though I do not always agree with them.

If a monitor is not mentioned it is because it has not been reviewed properly, been reviewed at all or is mediocre.  All monitors suffer from regular quality control issues: back-light bleeding and pixel issues (dead and stuck pixels).

Recommendations are PWM or Flicker Free:

I do not recommend monitors which use low LED PWM Dimming frequencies since they ruin motion clarity and cause some people to suffer from health issues like head aches and eyestrain.  LED PWM Dimming Side Effects.
« Last Edit: Today at 12:52:36 am by NCX »

Share on Facebook Share on Twitter



NCX

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 628
    • View Profile
Best 60-75hz Monitors
« Reply #2 on: August 12, 2018, 07:37:47 pm »
Best 60-75hz Monitors

Glossy* Monitors

*There are four kinds of glossy coatings used on monitors, they are the almost-glossy or low haze coating, full glossy, semi-glossy coating and plasma deposition coating.

There's only two modern (2016-2019) glossy-type coated 1440p monitor, the Dell S2718D and Nixues Pro VUE27S.  Neither are as accurate as the best matte competitors, and the Dell uses a semi-glossy coating which looks washed out under bright lighting, and looks grainy when viewed slightly off angle.

The Nixeus coated tempered glass some call Plasma Deposition Coating, is fairly accurate once set to the User mode, but has high input lag (>20ms) for a modern (2019) 1440p monitor.  PDC coated monitors are the clearest, least reflective and most vibrant type of glossy monitors, but the black looks greyish due to the perceived black depth decreasing glass covered black bezel.  The perceived black depth can be increased with bias lighting (light placed behind the display) or by placing non-stick silver tape tape on the black bezel.


Matte Monitors

1.) Samsung S27H850QFU (adjustable stand, AMD Free-Sync & 75hz)
2.) Asus VZ27AQ (AMD Free-Sync & 75hz)
3.) Dell S2719DM (AMD Free-Sync & 75hz)
4.) Acer BE270U (AMD Free-Sync & 75hz)

The Asus VZ27AQ (Free-Sync & 75hz), Dell S2719DM (Free-Sync & 75hz), Dell U2719D (very accurate PLS), Dell U2719DC (IPS with USB-C), iiyama XUB2792QSU-B1 and Samsung S27H850QFU (best/most accurate; Free-Sync & 75hz) are the best of the non-wide gamut 2560x1440 IPS/PLS 60-75hz monitors for casual (non 144hz+) gaming and preset color accuracy wise.

*The Dell S2719DM (74hz) and iiyama XUB2792QSU-B1 (73hz) drop or skip frames when overclocked above the bracketed refresh rates when connected to Nvidia graphics cards pre-Nvidia Free-Sync supporting drivers.  I'm not sure about the others or if the new Nvidia drivers from January 14th 2019 and on fix this issue since these monitors were tested before then.

The S2719D has fake HDR (lacks wide gamut 8 bit panel with full DCI-P3 color space coverage, local dimming and high brightness), only two HDMI, and the matte coating is slightly grainier than some competitors according to PC Monitors.

The Asus PA27AC and Viewsonic VP2768 only supports 60hz and lack Free-Sync, but are extremely accurate and supports hardware calibration with an accurate colorimeter like the X-Rite i1 Display Pro, and have 14 bit 3D Look Up Tables which help reduce banding and color and shade differentiation.

The very accurate and delay free BenQ PD2710QC, Dell U2719D, Dell U2719DC (USB-C), LG 27QD58P-B and Philips 272B7QUPBEB (USB-C) are also great 60hz matte 1440p options with 1000:1+ contrast and height adjustable stands.

Some other competitors are the Acer RC271U, Acer BE270U (Free-Sync & 75hz), AOC Q2790PQU, Dell U2715H, Dell U2717D, S2718D (semi-glossy), Lenovo L27q-10 IPS DP, Philips 272B8QJEB, Viewsonic VX2778 which aren't as accurate and/or have lower contrast than the monitors mentioned above.
« Last Edit: Today at 05:14:55 am by NCX »

NCX

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 628
    • View Profile
Best 144hz 1440p Monitors with Free-Sync
« Reply #3 on: August 12, 2018, 07:40:19 pm »
Best 144hz 1440p Monitors with Free-Sync

List of cards which support Free-Sync.  All monitors are matte.

1.) Acer Nitro VG270UP (40-144hz AMD Free-Sync & 120hz back-light strobing = Visual Boost Response); AHVA version
1.) Eizo FS2735 (48-144hz AMD Free-Sync & back-light strobing) AHVA; from 2015
2.) Acer XF270HUA bmiidprzx (30-144hz AMD Free-Sync) AHVA
3.) Gigabyte AORUS AD27QD (48-144hz AMD Free-Sync) AHVA
4.) Asus MG279Q (30-90hz AMD Free-Sync) AHVA
5.) Nixeus NX-EDG27Sv2 & NX-EDG27v2 (30-144hz AMD Free-Sync) AHVA
5.) Acer Nitro VG270UP (40-144hz AMD Free-Sync & 120hz back-light strobing = Visual Boost Response); Innolux IPS version

There are many non-big brand 144hz 1440p AUO AHVA panels (marketed as IPS) with AMD Free-Sync which have not been properly tested such as the Mbest, Nixeus Edge, Pixio PX277, and probably a few others from South Korea. 

The Acer Nitro VG270UP and Eizo Foris FS2735 is the best 144hz 1440p AHVA panel since they are very accurate as well as supports back-light strobing; the Acer is significantly cheaper and newer, but lacks a height adjustable stand and USB ports.  The Gigabyte AORUS AD27QD (Innolux IPS) has slightly slower pixel response times and significantly more overshoot ghosting than the AUO AHVA panels (marketed as IPS), but has a wider Free-Sync range than the MG279Q, as well as is more accurate, and has a semi-wide gamut panel with decent HDR color (not brightness) support for the price.

The Asus MG279Q has a limited Free-Sync range, but is fairly accurate, has faster pixel response times than the Innolux IPS version of the VG270UP and Nixeus, and has a perceived black depth increasing matte grey bezel.  The Free-Sync range can be increased to 60-144hz with the Custom Resolution Utility made by ToastyX.

The non-S version, the NX-EDG27v2 does not come with a height adjustable stand.  The Nixues is very accurate, but is a bit too warm (5800k color temperature) or has a minor preset orange or red dominance.  It can be considered to be display free or to have negligible input lag (TFT Central measured <5ms with the SMT Tool), but has significantly slower pixel response times than some AHVA panel using competitors, however, it is important to remember that the Nixeus is one of the cheapest 144hz 1440p non-TN panels, and that the Innolux IPS panels are also slower than the best AHVA panels such as the Acer XF270HUA bmiidprzx.

I'm not sure if the Nixeus is slower than the IPS version of the VG270UP since they were tested by different reviewers, and the Nixeus as better preset gamma accuracy than the VG270UP, but it can be improved by selecting the sRGB mode which locks the brightness and color controls.  Both are two of the cheapest 144hz 1440p non-TN panels,  so until more reviews come they will be equally ranked.
« Last Edit: May 10, 2019, 11:56:45 pm by NCX »

NCX

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 628
    • View Profile
Best 144hz 1440p Monitors with G-Sync
« Reply #4 on: August 12, 2018, 07:40:53 pm »
Best 144hz 1440p Monitors with G-Sync

1.) Viewsonic XG2703-GS (30-165hz Nvidia G-Sync) AHVA
2.) AOC AG271QG (30-144hz Nvidia G-Sync) AHVA
3.) Asus PG279QZ (30-165hz Nvidia G-Sync) AHVA
3.) Asus PG279Q (30-144hz Nvidia G-Sync) AHVA
4.) Acer XB271HU (30-165hz Nvidia G-Sync) AHVA
5.) Acer XB270HU (30-144hz Nvidia G-Sync) AHVA
6.) HP 27 Omen (30-165hz Nvidia G-Sync) TN
7.) Dell S2417DG (30-165hz Nvidia G-Sync) TN
8.) Dell S2716DG (30-144hz Nvidia G-Sync) TN
9.) Asus PG278Q (30-144hz Nvidia G-Sync) TN

There are five 144-165hz 2560x1440 matte AUO AHVA panels (marketed as IPS) with Nvidia G-Sync, of which the AOC AG271QG is currently the best since the Viewsonic XG2703-GS was discontinued.  The other two options are the Acer XB271HU (least accurate), and Asus PG279Q (overpriced and worst build quality) and PG279QZ, but none have gamma settings to combat potentially low preset gamma, the Acer suffers from a bit of overshoot ghosting at 60hz (important for console gaming), and the Asus can not scale 1080p very well.  All of these monitors suffer from an obvious preset green/yellow tint, as well as tend to under-saturate blue.  The Acer is the least accurate of the bunch, and AOC tends to purposefully preset their monitors gamma too low, but at least AOC has multiple useful gamma settings to achieve more linear 2.2 gamma while the Acer and Asus's gamma can only be lowered resulting in more washed out colors.

The S2417DG does not suffer from very obvious overshoot ghosting like the 27" (especially when looking at black on white/scrolling text), and has better preset color accuracy and less banding, plus it only comes with a light matte coating while the S2716DG can if a A00-A03 revision. A sticker on the back of Dell monitors indicates the manufacturing date and revision.

The Asus PG278Q comes in last place because it is very expensive, uses the grainiest matte coating used by a 1440p monitor since 2011, often comes with pathetically low average gamma (1.7 gamma average=washed out colors) and has many quality control and functionality related issues.


« Last Edit: May 10, 2019, 11:58:21 pm by NCX »

NCX

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 628
    • View Profile
Correct Display Height=Reduced AHVA/IPS/PLS Glow
« Reply #5 on: August 12, 2018, 07:43:01 pm »
Correct Display Height=Reduced AHVA/IPS/PLS Glow

Read The Article and/or watch The Extended YouTube Version
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cBAQ4Toxt9U
« Last Edit: May 10, 2019, 11:58:32 pm by NCX »

NCX

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 628
    • View Profile
Improve Perceived Contrast/Black Depth & Reduce Glare With Bias Lighting

Read the Steemit Article and/or watch it on YouTube
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s1Dnp7RTZWs
« Last Edit: May 10, 2019, 11:58:45 pm by NCX »

NCX

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 628
    • View Profile
Acer
« Reply #7 on: August 12, 2018, 07:44:08 pm »
Acer

Acer H277U

Review by Les Numeriques

The Acer H277HU uses a 60hz matte 8 bit 2560x1440 frame-less LG AH-IPS panel with good preset color accuracy, lots of inputs, fast pixel response times with minimal overshoot ghosting, but is not VESA compliant, and its frame-less casing has an inner black bezel which ruins its perceived black depth.


Acer XB270HU

Discontinued original 27" 2560x1440 144hz AUO AHVA panel with Nvidia G-Sync.

Spoiler (hover to show)


Acer XF270HUA  bmiidprzx

List of cards which support Free-Sync.

Review By Lim's Cave
Review by PRAD
Review by Trusted Reviews

Accurate matte 2560x1440 144hz AUO AHVA (marketed as IPS) panel with AMD Free-Sync (40-144hz range supported by the Displayport and HDMI 2.0) with a fully adjustable stand, Displayport, Dul-Link DVI, HDMI 1.4, HDMI 2.0 (144hz), 4x USB 3.0 and 3.5mm Audio In and Out.


Acer XB271HU

Review by Alexander Gryzhin (=DEAD=)
Measurements and Review by Belgium Hardware
Review by NCX (archived version)
Review by PC Mag
Review by Rtings
Review by Trusted Reviews

It's pretty much the same as the PG279Q.  The Acer XB271HU uses a 27" 2560x1440 resolution 8 Bit AUO AHVA panel, a nearly grain free matte coating, has good color presets aside from a preset green tint, a frame-less casing with an inner black bezel which decreases the perceived black depth, fast pixel response times and a 144hz refresh rate.  G-Sync (Nvivida GPU required) works from 30-165hz (144hz is the default maximum refresh rate but it can be overclocked to 165hz), eliminates tearing and lag, but Lightboost is limited to 120z.  It also has an HDMI input which allows it to work with external devices like consoles.


Acer BE270UA

Review by PC Mag
Review by PRAD (slightly too high gamma)
Review by Toms Hardware (high 2.4+ gamma)

The BE270HUA has a fully adjustable stand, a fake frame-less casing with a perceived black depth decreasing inner black bezel, a native 75hz refresh rate, and supports AMD Free-Sync.  It's not very accurate since it can come with high preset gamma and a strong preset yellow tint.


Acer RC271U

Review by PRAD


Acer Nitro VG270UP

VG270UP AHVA Panel Review by =DEAD=
VG270UP Innolux IPS Panel Review by =DEAD=
Review by Les Numeriques (unsure if AUO AHVA or Innolux IPS panel)

The Acer uses a fake bezel/frame-less (it has an inner black bezel which reduces the perceived black depth versus a grey bezel) 144hz AUO M270DAN02 AHVA panel (advertised as IPS) with Displayport (Free-Sync + 40-144hz range), HDMI 1.4, HDMI 2.0 (Free-Sync + 40-144hz range) and 3.5mm Audio Out.  It supports AMD Free-Sync (40-144hz range), 120hz back-light strobing (named VRB=Visual Boost Response,

The reviews by =DEAD= review contains photos of the Test UFO Ghosting test which proves that the AUO AHVA panel is faster (OD Normal) out of the box, has a useful Extreme overdrive setting with only a bit of overshoot ghosting, which is noted in this section of the review.

Test UFO Ghosting Test Overdrive Comparisons: AUO AHVA versus Innolux IPS

The AUO AHVA panel has significantly more accurate preset color accuracy, especially the gamma since  the Innolux IPS has low gamma (scroll down to see this chart) while the AUO AHVA panel has nearly perfect 2.2 preset gamma and 93% DCI-P3 color space coverage for games with HDR support. The Innolux panel does use a semi-wide gamut panel which over-saturates the colors of SDR (HDTV/REC 709 & sRGB) content out of the box, but does have an sRGB mode to prevent the 34% over-saturation, as well as offer proper 2.2-ish gamma; AHVA vs IPS sRGB Color Space comparisons.

The last significant difference is the AUO AHVA panel suffers from white glow when viewing black while the Innolux IPS suffers from brownish-red glow; compare multiple photos: AUO AHVA vs Innolux IPS.

Conclusion:

The AUO AHVA panel is better since it has superior preset color accuracy or image quality for the majority of consumer content which use SDR color spaces (HDTV/REC 709 & sRGB), and has faster pixel response times and less overshoot ghosting than the Innolux panel. The Gigabyte AORUS AD27QD has similar overdrive, but is significantly more accurate than the Innolux VG270UP, and has a height adjustable stand which makes it worth the extra money since height adjustable stands cost at least 50$ US, and the 150$ US X-rite Colormunki is the cheapest accurate colorimeter.


Acer Nitro XV272UPBMIIPRZX

Review by =DEAD=

Fully adjustable matte 144hz 2560x1440 10 bit (8 bit +FRC) Innolux IPS panel with AMD Free-Sync (48-144hz), Disaplayport (144hz), HDMI 1.4 (70hz), HDMI 2.0 (144hz), 4x USB 3.0 and 3.5mm Audio Out.  The Innolux IPS panel is wide gamut and supports 95% of the DCI-P3 (HDR) color space natively, so the monitor must be set to the sRGB mode to prevent the over-saturation of SDR media (HDTV/REC 709 and sRGB) color.  The XV272 is very accurate out of the box, as well as when set to the HDR and sRGB mode whic should be used to prevent color over-saturation when not viewing HDR content.  The XV272UPBMIIPRZX has the same overdrive as the Innolux IPS panel in the VG270UP which means that it is slower than the 144-165hz 1440p AUO AHVA panels.
« Last Edit: Today at 05:35:54 am by NCX »

NCX

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 628
    • View Profile
AOC
« Reply #8 on: August 12, 2018, 08:00:05 pm »
AOC

AOC AGON AG271QG

Review by Alexander Gryzhin (=DEAD=)
Review by Digital Versus
Review by PC Monitors
Review by Playwares
Review by PRAD (low preset gamma)
Review by Sweclockers

The AOC AGON AG271QG uses a 27" 2560x1440 essentially grain free matte AUO AHVA panel with 30-165hz Nvidia G-Sync range.  It has a fully adjustable stand, lots of inputs and a matte black bezel.  The AG271QG is the best of the AHVA panels (marketed as IPS) since it has better resolution scaling (vs Asus; important for console use and 1080p) and two different gamma settings to combat the potentially low preset gamma all 144hz 1440p G-Sync AHVA (marketed as IPS) panels can come with, as well as has 2 useful overdrive settings and better build quality than the Asus which has a fake-thin casing with a perceived black depth reducing inner black bezel.  The AOC AG271QC reviewed by PRAD came with low preset gamma while the rest of the tested units are great. 


AOC Q2770PQU

Discontinued 2014 2560x1440 matte Samsung PLS panel.

Spoiler (hover to show)


AOC Q2775PQU


Review by Nl Hardware

It's pretty much the same as the Q2770PQU image quality wise and offers slightly faster pixel response times, but it too has a 20ms delay.


AOC Q2781PQ

Review by Tom's Hardware

Matte LH AH-IPS with Displayport, 2x HDMI, VGA and 3.5mm Audio Out.

AOC Q2790PQU

Review by Belgium Hardware & Measurements

Fairly accurate, fully adjust-able and delay free matte LG AH-IPS with Displayport, 2x HDMI 1.4, 4x USB 3.0, VGA and 3.5mm Audio In & Out.  The sRGB mode is fairly accurate while the preset Standard mode is too blue and green, and the User mode which unlocks the color controls suffers from more of a preset blue and green dominance, and both the Standard and User mode have too high preset gamma averaging between 2.3 and 2.4.  Tom's Hardware measured a 63ms delay with their own methodology which translates to over 20ms if measured with the Leo Bodnar device which means it has high input lag for a 1440p monitor made after 2016.


AOC Q27P1

Review by Playwares

Matte 27" 1440p IPS with a fully adjustable stand, perceived black depth increasing dark matte grey bezel, Displayport, Dual-Link DVI, HDMI, VGA, 4x USB 3.1, and 3.5mm  Audio In & Out.  The AOC has very low preset gamma (<1.75=very washed out colors and shades), but can be improved by setting the Gamma to 3, suffers from a strong preset green tint and can't, but almost covers the HDTV/REC 709 or sRGB color space, and slightly under and over-saturates colors.
« Last Edit: May 18, 2019, 12:56:55 am by NCX »

NCX

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 628
    • View Profile
Asus
« Reply #9 on: August 12, 2018, 08:07:13 pm »
Asus

Asus MG279Q

The Asus MG279Q uses a 27" 2560x1440 resolution 8 Bit AUO AHVA panel, a nearly grain free matte coating, has excellent colour presets when the Racing mode is selected, a high quality matte grey bezel which vastly increases the perceived black depth, fast pixel response times and a 144hz refresh rate.  Free-Sync (AMD GPU required) works from 30-90fps, eliminates tearing and lag, but the has >10ms delay when not set to 144hz.

Review by Daywalker
Review by =DEAD=
Review by Extrahardware CZ
Hardware Info Test Results
Review by Playwares
Review by PRAD
Review by SWECLOCKERS
Review by TFT Central

List of cards which support Free-Sync.


Asus MX27AQ

Discontinued 2014-2016 monitor.

Spoiler (hover to show)


Asus PB278Q

Discontinued 2014-2017 matte AUO AHVA panel which replaced  the original PLS panel using version from 2012-2014.
Spoiler (hover to show)

Asus PG279Q

The Asus PG279Q uses a 27" 2560x1440 resolution 8 Bit AUO AHVA panel, a nearly grain free matte coating, has good colour presets aside from a preset green tint, a matte black bezel and an inner black bezel which decreases the perceived black depth, fast pixel response times and a 144hz refresh rate.  G-Sync (Nvivida GPU required) works from 30-165hz (144hz is the default maximum refresh rate but it can be overclocked to 165hz), eliminates tearing and lag, but Lightboost is limited to 120z.  It also has an HDMI input which allows it to work with external devices like consoles.

Review by =DEAD=
Review by Digital Versus
Review by Extrahardware CZ
Review by Hardware.Info
Review by NCX
Review by PC Lab PL
Review by PRAD
Review by Sweclockers
Review by TFT Central

Asus VZ27AQ

Review by PRAD

Asus VZ27AQ uses a 75hz matte 2560x1440 LG AH-IPS panel with AMD Free-Sync and excellent all around performance.

Asus MAZ27AQ

Review by Les Numeriques

Asus PA27AC

Review by Alexander Gryzhin (=DEAD=)
Review by IBXT

Matte fake frame-less 8 bit +FRC (unsure if AHVA/IPS/PLS despite marketing as IPS) panel with accurate color presets, AMD Free-Sync, 75hz and hardware calibration (requires colorimeter like the X-Rite i1 display pro) and 14 bit 3D LUT.  The hardware calibration feature can not provide as accurate results as free calibration software such as dispcalgui.  Reduce the Trace Free setting from 60 to 40 to reduce the obvious overshoot ghosting, and 20 to get rid of the overshoot entirely.

Asus PG279QZ

Review by Rtings

The Asus PG279QZ is an updated version of the PG279Q (2015), released in 2019, and with zero improvements.  The PG279QZ is fully adjustable, has Displayport (30-165hz Nvidia G-Sync), HDMI, G-Sync (Nvidia GPU required), ULMB (120hz back-light strobing), 2x USB 3.0 and the same fake-thin matte grey casing with an inner black bezel which decreases the perceived black depth.  The PG279QZ Rtings tested has excellent all-around performance, however, without more reviews available, it's impossible to know if it is consistently accurate unlike the PG279Q.
« Last Edit: May 11, 2019, 12:17:43 am by NCX »

NCX

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 628
    • View Profile
BenQ
« Reply #10 on: August 12, 2018, 08:16:34 pm »
BenQ

BenQ BL2710PT

Discontinued 2013 monitor.

Spoiler (hover to show)


BenQ GW2765HT

Spoiler (hover to show)


BenQ PD2700Q

Review by Alexander Gryzhin
Review by PRAD (2016)
Review by PRAD (2018; low input lag)
Review by Tom's Hardware

The BenQ PD2700Q uses a matte 2560x1440 8 Bit +FRC AUO AHVA panel encased in a nice sparkly and coarsely surfaced matte grey plastic casing which has a fully adjust-able stand.  The PD2700Q has excellent preset color accuracy, fast pixel response times with minimal overshoot ghosting, negligible input lag and excellent resolution scaling which is good for those who play or watch both 720p (Xbox 360 & PS3) and 1080p content.


BenQ PD2710QC

Review by Alexander Gryzhin (=DEAD=)
Measurements and Review by Belgium Hardware
Review by Les Numeriques
Review by PRAD
Review by Tom's Hardware

Matte fake frame-less 8 bit 2560x1440 LG AH-IPS panel with a height adjustable stand and  4x USB 3.0.  It has excellent preset color accuracy, fast pixel response times with minimal overshoot ghosting, negligible input lag and excellent resolution scaling which is good for those who play or watch both 720p (Xbox 360 & PS3) and 1080p content.


BenQ SW2700PT

Spoiler (hover to show)


BenQ PV2720

Review by Alexander Gryzhin
Review by IBXT
Review by Playwares
Review by PRAD

The BenQ PV270 is wide gamut monitor created for those who calibrated their monitors use programs which support color management.  It has a 14 bit 3d LUT, color compensation, better color presets and overdrive (less overshoot ghosting) than the SW2700T, and BenQ's hardware calibration program, Palette Master works better with the PV270.
« Last Edit: May 11, 2019, 12:18:05 am by NCX »

NCX

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 628
    • View Profile
Crossover
« Reply #11 on: August 12, 2018, 08:27:53 pm »
Crossover

Crossover 2795QHD
Spoiler (hover to show)


Crossover 27S IPS DP Freedom
Spoiler (hover to show)


Crossover 27100Q
Spoiler (hover to show)


Crossover 27 Fast 144

Review by Playwares

The Crossover 27 Fast 144 uses a 27" 2560x1440 resolution 8 Bit AUO AHVA panel, a nearly grain free matte coating, has excellent colour presets, a matte black and silver bezel, fast pixel response times and a 144hz refresh rate. Free-Sync (AMD GPU required) works from 30-90fps, eliminates tearing and lag.

Crossover 2720MDP

Discontinued glossy 2012 IPS.

Spoiler (hover to show)


Crossover 2730MD

Discontinued glossy 2013 IPS.

Spoiler (hover to show)


Crossover AMG & QW Series Monitors

Discontinued 2013-2014 IPS panels with Plasma Deposition Coating

Spoiler (hover to show)
« Last Edit: May 11, 2019, 12:18:31 am by NCX »

NCX

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 628
    • View Profile
Dell
« Reply #12 on: August 12, 2018, 11:43:03 pm »
Dell

Dell U2715H

Review by Daywalker
PRAD's Review
TFT Centrals Review

The Dell U2715H has good color presets, fast pixel response times, minimal overshoot and a low delay like the Asus PB278QR and LG 27MB85R-B.  The U2715H is overpriced uses LG's frame-less casing which is not actually frame-less.  Frame-less monitors have inner black bezels which ruin the perceived black depth and make dark content look a bit washed out, just like glossy black and matte black bezels do.  Example: notice how light the black letter box bars look compared to the monitors inner black bezel.


Dell U2717D

Review by Alexander Gryzhin (=DEAD=)
Review by Belgium Hardware
Review by Les Numeriques
Review by PRAD
Review by Rtings (high lag)
Review by Sweclockers U2717DA version with adjustable arm
Review by TFT Central (high lag)

Spoiler (hover to show)

The Dell U2717D has worse color presets than the U2715H and many competitors, has decent contrast (900:1), fast pixel response times, but suffers from overshoot ghosting and a 20ms delay.  The U2717D is essentially an overpriced version of the Qnix QHD2730R with a height adjustable stand and better warranty, but worse color presets, overshoot ghosting and no overclocking. 

The U2717D is uses LG's fake frame-less casing which is not actually frame-less.  Frame-less monitors have inner black bezels which decrease the perceived black depth and make dark content look a bit washed out, just like glossy black and matte black bezels do.  Example: notice how light the black letter box bars look compared to the monitors inner black bezel.

The U2717D reviewed by Les Numeriques has lower input lag and better color presets which indicates to me that Les Numeriques reviewed a newer revision.


Dell U2716D

Review by =DEAD=
Review by Hardware.Info
Review by PC Monitors

The Dell UP2716D is the first decent wide gamut monitor Dell has released.  The UP2716D has low input lag and minimal overshoot ghosting unlike its predecessor the U2713H which suffered from excessive overshoot ghosting.  As expected the sRGB mode has locked color controls and is inferior to that of a normal monitor.  The UP2716D is a good choice for those who need a wide gamut monitor, intend to calibrate it, and use it with programs which support color management.  The UP2716D is a waste of money for gaming and regular use (text, email, movies, coding, ect).


Dell S2718D

Review by Alexander Gryzhin (=DEAD=)
Review by PC Magazine
Review by Sweclockers
Review by Tom's Hardware

Fake frame-less semi-glossy (same coating as the HP 24 Envy I tested; the semi-glossy coating looks washed out in brightly lit rooms and the S2718D looks grainy when viewed slightly off angle) 2560x1440 LG AH-IPS panel with height adjustable stand.  It has negligible input lag, good preset color accuracy and competitive pixel response times for  a 60hz panel.


Dell S2719DM

Review by PC Monitors

The Dell lacks a height adjustable stand and is not VESA compliant, as well as drop or skip frames when overclocked above 74hz when connected to Nvidia graphics cards.  It has fake HDR (lacks wide gamut 8 bit panel with full DCI-P3 color space coverage, local dimming and high brightness), only two HDMI, and the matte coating is slightly grainier than some competitors according to PC Monitors.


Dell S2719DC

Measurements by Belgium Hardware


Dell U2719DC

Review by Alexander Gryzhin (=DEAD=)

Fully adjustable, matte, 2560x1440 IPS with Displayport In & Out (for Daisy Chaining), HDMI, 4x USB 3.0, USB-C, 3.5mm Audio OUt and accurate out-of-the-box color accuracy in the default Standard mode.


Dell U2719D

Measurements and Review by Belgium Hardware
Review by PC Monitors
Review by TFT Central

Fully adjustable, matte, 2560x1440 PLS (LTM270DL11) with Displayport In & Out (for Daisy Chaining), HDMI, 4x USB 3.0, 3.5mm Audio Out and accurate out-of-the-box colors in the default Standard mode, especially in the case of the unit Belgium Hardware tested.  The unit TFT Central tested which is too warm at 5653k (preset orange and red dominance).  The U2719D has a medium matte coating which looks slightly grainy/sparkly when viewing light colors and white according to PC Monitors.
« Last Edit: Today at 05:14:03 am by NCX »

NCX

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 628
    • View Profile
Eizo
« Reply #13 on: August 12, 2018, 11:51:08 pm »
Eizo

Eizo CG277 & CX271

The Eizo CG277 and CX271 use a matte 2560x1440 8 Bit +FRC LG AH-IPS panel, are glow free, can be hardware calibrated, self-calibrated (the CG277 has a built in colorimeter) and have colour compensation. The CX271 is the same as the CG277 but does not come with a built in colorimeter.

Review by PRAD

Eizo CG2730

Review by PRAD


Eizo EV2736W

Discontinued 2013 monitor which used multiple matte 2560x1440 Samsung PLS panels.

Spoiler (hover to show)


Eizo FS2735

Review by Extra Hardware CZ
Review by Hardware Info
Review by PRAD
Review by TFT Central

The Eizo FS2735 uses a 27" 2560x1440 resolution 8 Bit AUO AHVA panel, a nearly grain free matte coating, excellent colour presets, a high quality matte black bezel which increases the perceived black depth*, fast pixel response times and a 144hz refresh rate. Free-Sync (AMD GPU required) works from 56-144hz/fps, eliminates tearing and lag, it is the only AHVA Free-Sync monitor with back-light strobing, and has excellent 1080p scaling which makes it the best all around 27" 1440p AHVA 144hz monitor for PC and console gaming, and watching 1080p content.

*Dark matte grey bezels increase the perceived black depth even more.


Eizo EV2750

Review by Alexander Gryzhin (=DEAD=)


Eizo CG279X

Review by PRAD

Matte, fully wide gamut and fully adjustable 2560x1440 resolution LG AH-IPS panel with a built in colorimeter, Displayport, Dual-Link DVI, HDMI, USB-C, 2x USB 2.0 (back), 2x USB 3.0 (side) and a 16 bit 3D LUT.  The Eizo has very accurate color presets aside from the DCI-P3 mode which has very high, 2.6 preset gamma which causes black crush, but it is important to note that the point of monitors like the CG279X is to be hardware calibrated with an accurate colorimeter, and used for work with programs which support color management.  The Eizo has slow pixel response times, but fairly low input lag (9ms) for a professional display.
« Last Edit: May 11, 2019, 12:19:09 am by NCX »

NCX

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 628
    • View Profile
Gigabyte
« Reply #14 on: August 13, 2018, 12:05:25 am »
Gigabyte

Gigabyte AORUS AD27QD

Measurements and Review by Belgium Hardware
Review by =DEAD=
Review by IT Hardware PL
Review by IBXT
Review by Rtings
Review by TFT Central

Very accurate and fully adjustable matte 2560x1440 144hz wide gamut Innolux IPS panel with Displayport, 2x HDMI 2.0, HDR support+, RGB Lighting, 2x USB 3.0 and 3.5mm Audio In & Out.  The sRGB mode must be selected to prevent the 30% wide color gamut over-saturation of non-HDR sources and ensure maximum color accuracy.  The sRGB mode locks the brightness and color controls and leaves the monitor stuck at over 180cdm/2. 

The Balance overdrive setting is the best for 60hz while both Balance and Speed are useful with 144hz, however, the Speed setting adds quite a bit of overshoot ghosting which may disturb even casual gamers and display users who usually do not notice overdrive flaws.  I recommend using the Balance setting for all refresh rates, as well as can't recommend this monitor to those who are upgrading from fast LED PWM Dimming or Flicker Free 120hz+ monitors.  The Balance overdrive setting has significantly slower pixel response times than all five* of the 144-165hz 1440p AUO AHVA (marketed as IPS) panels with G-Sync, however, the Gigabyte is significantly more accurate than all of them aside from the ViewSonic XG2703-GS which was discontinued in summer of 2018.

+It can accept an HDR signal and dsiplay 95% DCI-P3 color, but is less (470cdm/2 with HDR on) than half as bright as the HDR standard brightness of 1000cdm/2, and lacks local dimming result greyish black and washed out dark content due to the 1100:1 contrast ratio.  Bright bias (light placed behind the display) or room lighting can help trick the eyes into perceiving greyish black as true black.

*Acer XB270HU, Acer XB271HU, AOC AG271QG, Asus PG279Q and the ViewSonic XG2703-GS.


Old Irrelevant Pre-TFT Central Review Analysis
Spoiler (hover to show)
« Last Edit: May 11, 2019, 12:19:27 am by NCX »