Author Topic: Dell S2719DGF Review: Matte 27" 2560x1440 144hz AUO TN Panel with AMD Free-Sync  (Read 8244 times)

NCX

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 688
    • View Profile
Lights Off Comparisons

All monitors had their brightness settings reduced to output 140cdm/2 before and after calibration.  I had to reduce the S2719DGF's Contrast setting to calibrate it which is why the contrast dropped to 680:1.

To properly compare the photos right click on the photos and closely inspect larger versions in a new tab, especially if experiencing trouble with the spoiler pop downs.  Since the S2719DGF has nearly perfect preset color accuracy the main difference seen in the photos is the brightness and darkness of colors and shades which is determined by the preset gamma which is too low, and results in colors and shades being brighter, or more washed out than they're supposed to be.  The un-calibrated versus calibrated differences are very obvious when comparing a TN panel with low gamma and vertical gamma shift to an AHVA/IPS/PLS or VA (A-MVA, S-MVA, S-PVA, ect) panel.

Dell S2719DGF Un-Calibrated; 960:1 Contrast
Spoiler (hover to show)

Dell S2719DGF Calibrated; 680:1 Contrast
Spoiler (hover to show)

Acer XB271HU ICC Profile Black; 1000:1 Contrast
Spoiler (hover to show)

The Acer suffers from obvious back-light bleed in the bottom right corner.

Dell S2719DGF ICC Profile Black; 680:1 contrast
Spoiler (hover to show)

Back-light bleed or uniformity issues are more obvious if a monitor has low contrast.  The S2719DGF does not suffer from obvious back-light bleed, even once the contrast is reduced from 960 to 680:1 after calibration.  My panel has a few impure spots, but no obvious bleed during normal use.

Viewsonic XG2402 ICC Profile Black; 900:1 Contrast
Spoiler (hover to show)

Viewsonic XG2703-GS ICC Profile Black; 900:1 Contrast
Spoiler (hover to show)

The XG2703-GS also suffers from a bit of back-light bleed in the bottom right corner.
« Last Edit: April 26, 2019, 07:43:19 pm by NCX »